Archive for February, 2008

The Irony of History: Land Rover & Jaguar

Wikipedia offers us this on Land Rover: “Land Rover is a British all-terrain vehicle and Multi Purpose Vehicle (MPV) manufacturer, based in Gaydon, England, UK.”

And this on Jaguar
: “Jaguar Cars Limited is a luxury car manufacturer, originally based at Browns Lane, Coventry, England but now at Whitley, Coventry.”

Currently, Jaguar and Land Rover brands are produced by Ford. A bit of irony there as the United States became the hegemon and overwhelmed her colonizer. The UK taxed us into the Revolutionary War and we came out victorious. To me a greater irony lies in the rapid expansion of India because of the exploitative nature of British rule. Now it seems an Indian car company, Tata, will begin producing these unmistakably British cars.

The phrase history repeats itself is often recanted. It makes you wonder what will be in store for the current super powers?

Law and Virtual Words Part I

In my recent obsession with reading and compiling news feeds. I happened upon an interesting article about what role law, specifically criminal law, might have in online games. It is an interesting question. Anyone who has played any type of online game knows that they can be addicting and foster a sense of attachment to in game accomplishments. The latter is also true of games that are not played online. I think Everquest typifies the beginning of the Massively Multiplayer Online game. From my personal experience with people that I know, Blizzard’s Diablo II is a perfect example of how online worlds transcend their online limitations when they enter markets that exchange for actual money. The basis of this in the aforementioned game was selling items on EBay. Thus, players actions in the game would translate into material gain outside the game. I imagine almost every news story that frequented the press several years ago about violent video games causing violence or depression included a story about Everquest. The addicting nature of that game apparently caused people to become emotionally disturbed and even (if my memory serves me correctly) kill themselves. If anyone reads this and can do a quick websearch on it, please post a comment.

The question is then whether or not the effects that take place outside the dominion of the virtual world are under the authority of the government to regulate?

The way I would like to answer this question is in the negative.

I would like to explore the above question a bit more…look out for Part II soon.

Police Discretion

If anyone has any advice on the subject of police discretion, please let me know. Currently, I am working on a paper about that very subject. It is turning out to be one of those papers where I am not sure of the side I am taking while I am writing it. Sort of the ‘your thesis materializes as you go’ paper.

This Summer

Well, one minute I am complaining about this quarter going by too fast and the next I am thinking about this summer. That has been the craziness of this year for me. I was never exactly sure what my post-graduating plans would be, but now its time to decide more thoroughly.

This decision most immediately manifests itself it in choosing classes for next quarter. Since my propensity to attend Law School is ever increasing, I have decided to take classes that focus on writing. I do not consider myself a poor writer, but I think investing some time would be a great resource. On that note, I am taking an English course that focuses on writing about ethical issues. I thought this would be interesting and most applicable to the type of writing I do. I am also going to take a History of Philosophy course. Fall Quarter I took the first course in this series and really enjoyed. It is fascinating how influential thinkers’ ideas pop up throughout history. Of course, I am taking Chinese, which I have grown to dislike. Thankfully, this will be the last Chinese course I have to take. Chinese is not a friend of my GPA, I just keep thinking: why didn’t I take Spanish? The last course I will have will be Economics of the Environment and Natural Resources. I am pretty excited for this class because I like the teacher and the subject-matter. It will cover air pollution, fishing, and global warming. Considering the craziness of the debate topic junior year of high school, I should have some knowledge to bring to the table.

To complicate matters further, Monica and I want to move soon. Hopefully, we can pull that off without a hitch.

Two Fridays ago, I participated in a program where we went to several law firms, a non-profit, and the district court. I firmly believe that this aided my desire to attend law school. It drives me nuts though thinking about preparing for a decent LSAT. I am becoming more confident that I can do it though. I have been mulling over taking a test prep class just to be certain I do well. I feel like I can hit my peak success at standardized tests.

In the meantime, I have to continue the ridiculous amount of reading that I have for the History of Economic Thought. Also, I have a paper that I want to write on police discretion, so hopefully that will be done soon. There are also about a million things I need to do for CPP!

What Does it Mean to Oppose Real ID?

I was reading over an article titled Colorado Opposes Real ID Plan
and I got excited at the prospect of another state outright rejecting the plan. Then I read on:

On a February 1 deadline, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) granted Colorado’s request for an extension regarding the Real ID plan. The extension gives Colorado until January 1, 2010 to comply with the law. However, in a somewhat confusing situation, the DHS says it will not enforce Real ID until that date for all states because so many are opposed to it, while still requiring states to request extensions if they claim difficulty reaching compliance. The original start date for Real ID was May 11, 2008. 39 states have opposed Real ID either by receiving extensions, or by approving or proposing resolutions in their legislatures.

There seems to be some confusion that filing for an extension is an opposition. I guess in the sense that one could apply for an extension with the belief that the plan would be derailed in the future, but I think the likely reason is that it is not feasible. Hopefully, this discrepancy is clarified as reporting continues.

Teetering on the Brink of Finals

I did not think I would be saying this already, but the quarter system has doomed me to start thinking about finals. I was paging through a syllabus and realized we have a paper due on the last day of class – March 6. If someone told me something fun was happening on March 6 I would be excited because that means it is close. When I was told this quarter was ending the second week of March…I got a little scared.

The weather around Chicago has been crazy lately. Snow Storm Warnings. Flash Flood Warnings. Wind Chill Advisories. I do not know how to prepare for today.

So I have turned to the blog. I have decided to start making more posts in the ‘Life’ Category because I realize all of you might not care about Real ID. My recent choice to use the blog as a depository for research does not exactly cater to this crowd. I do think it would make a great debate case though!

Castro Resigns!

My wishes have always been to discharge my duties to my last breath. That’s what I can offer.

Well, this is a bit of old news, but Castro has resigned. I am not sure how this will change U.S. Foreign Policy in the immediate future, but hopefully it results in the increasing well-being of the Cuban people.

Blu-ray Trumps HD DVD

Perhpas I did not give enough credit to Sony, but it appears that their Blu-ray format will take over after Toshiba bows out from the HD DVD biz.:

Toshiba said Tuesday that it would cease production of its HD DVD players and recorders immediately and close out the business by the end of March.

It is a good thing I did not pick up a HD DVD player for the 360. I am wondering if the result of this format war was not the superiority of one over the another (because my understanding is they were nearly identical except for what studios/companies were supporting what technology), but maybe the market is not ready to replace DVDs yet. In fact, I feel almost certain that this is the case.

The technology to access these high def formats has recently come down in price from its formerly sky high position. Maybe the folks at Toshiba knew a little bit more than the average consumer when they were lowering prices though. The movies themselves are also more expensive in this format. The key to all of this really is the HDTV. A consumer has zero demand for any of these products without the TV to access it. Perhaps this also says something about that market, but I think we can expect HDTVs to be even more pervasive than they have come.

All in all, I am curious if Sony’s Blu-ray winning this battle against HD DVD means that Blu-ray is the next step after DVDs or just another stepping stone on the way to the next HD format.

Is an Illinois Driver’s License Real ID-compliant?

The Illinois DMV says:

Is this a “Real ID” Compliant Card?
The federal government has not yet issued any federal regulations for the Real ID Act. While this card contains features that we expect will be included in these future regulations, this card is not related to the Real ID Act.

When the regulations are issued, Illinois will determine if any additional changes are needed when those regulations take effect. Until then, Illinois will continue to make improvements to meet the immediate needs for technology upgrades and the challenges of ensuring card security.

This answer worries me as far as Illinois’s propensity to implement the Real ID Act.

S. 563 02/13/08 Senate Real ID Extension Bill

To extend the deadline by which State identification documents shall comply with certain minimum standards and for other purposes. (Introduced in Senate)
S 563 IS

110th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 563
To extend the deadline by which State identification documents shall comply with certain minimum standards and for other purposes.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

February 13, 2007

Ms. COLLINS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs


A BILL
To extend the deadline by which State identification documents shall comply with certain minimum standards and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MINIMUM DOCUMENT REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 202(a)(1) of the REAL ID Act of 2005 (49 U.S.C. 30301 note) is amended by striking `3 years after the date of the enactment of this division’ and inserting `2 years after the promulgation of final regulations to implement this section’.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO EXTEND COMPLIANCE DEADLINES.

    Section 205(b) of the REAL ID Act of 2005 (49 U.S.C. 30301 note) is amended–
  •  
      (1) by striking `The Secretary’ and inserting the following:
  •  
      `(1) IN GENERAL- The Secretary’; and
  •  
      (2) by adding at the end the following:
  •  
      `(2) LACK OF VALIDATION SYSTEMS- If the Secretary determines that the Federal or State electronic systems required to verify the validity and completeness of documents under section 202(c)(3) are not available to any State on the date described in section 202(a)(1), the requirements under section 202(c)(1) shall not apply to any State until adequate electronic validation systems are available to all States.’.

SEC. 3. NEGOTIATED RULEMAKING.

    (a) Negotiated Rulemaking Committee- The Secretary of Homeland Security shall reconvene the committee originally established pursuant to section 7212(b)(4) of the 9/11 Commission Implementation Act of 2004 (49 U.S.C. 30301 note), with the addition of any new interested parties, including experts in privacy protection, experts in civil liberties and protection of constitutional rights, and experts in immigration law, to–
  •  
      (1) review the regulations proposed by the Secretary of Homeland Security to implement section 202 of the REAL ID Act of 2005 (49 U.S.C. 30301 note);
  •  
      (2) review the provisions of the REAL ID Act of 2005;
  •  
      (3) submit recommendations to the Secretary of Homeland Security regarding appropriate modifications to such regulations; and
  •  
      (4) submit recommendations to the Secretary of Homeland Security and Congress regarding appropriate modifications to the REAL ID Act of 2005.
    (b) Criteria- In conducting the review under subsection (a)(1), the committee shall consider, in addition to other factors at the discretion of the committee, modifications to the regulations to–
  •  
      (1) minimize conflicts between State laws regarding driver’s license eligibility;
  •  
      (2) include procedures and requirements to protect the Federal and State constitutional rights, civil liberties, and privacy rights of individuals who apply for and hold driver’s licenses and personal identification cards;
  •  
      (3) protect the security of all personal information maintained in electronic form;
  •  
      (4) provide individuals with procedural and substantive due process, including rules and right of appeal, to challenge errors in data records contained within the databases created to implement section 202 of the REAL ID Act of 2005;
  •  
      (5) ensure that private entities are not permitted to scan the information contained on the face of a license, or in the machine readable component of the license, and resell, share, or trade such information with third parties;
  •  
      (6) provide a fair system of funding to limit the costs of meeting the requirements of section 202 of the REAL ID Act of 2005;
  •  
      (7) facilitate the management of vital identity-proving records; and
  •  
      (8) improve the effectiveness and security of Federal documents used to validate identification.
    (c) Rulemaking- To the extent that the final regulations to implement section 202 of the REAL ID Act of 2005 do not reflect the modifications recommended by the committee pursuant to subsection (a)(3), the Secretary of Homeland Security shall include, with such regulations in the Federal Register, the reasons for rejecting such modifications.
    (d) Reports- Upon submitting recommendations to the Secretary of Homeland Security under subsection (a), the committee shall submit a report to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives that includes–
  •  
      (1) the list of recommended modifications to the regulations that were submitted to the Secretary of Homeland Security under subsection (a)(3); and
  •  
      (2) a list of recommended amendments to the Real ID Act of 2005 that would address any concerns that could not be resolved by regulation.

Link



Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

Close
E-mail It